Hi, On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Fujii Masao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > >> My version doesn't have support for auxiliary processes. Does the >> synchronous replication patch need that? > > Yes, the background writer also generates the WAL like a backend, > so it has to be able to communicate with walsender. > >> On closer look, I don't see anything setting ProcSignalData.pid field. Which >> make me believe that the patch can't possibly work. > > Ooops! My patch has some bugs :( > I will update the patch based on yours, and add the support for auxiliary > processes into it.
Or, should I leave renewal of the patch to you? Of course, if you don't have time, I will do. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
