On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Dmitry Turin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Pgsql-hackers. > > We would like to obtain your opinion on these two questions: > > > 1) We wanna append possibilities into Postgres engine, and wanna get top > estimation for > size of code, cost and time of implementation. > 1.1) We divide possibilities to elementary features, find analogues in > already written > code, and suppose e.g., that quantity of lines for 'create timer' will be > similar to > 'create function', and that implementation for 'create timer' is easy than > implementation > of 'create function' (because it already has prototype in 'create > function', and coping > source code is possiblle) > 1.2) We calculate cost and time by COCOMO > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocomo > > How relevant is this estimation ? > > > 2) We are captivated by price of Indians, > we listened much about low quality of code, written by Indians, How do you identify that the code written by Indians is low in quality ? Do you subcontracted to an Indian company or so ? > > we are fearing, that American company will resale implementation to Indian > subcontractor > (i.e. real developers will be Indians anyway). > > > What requirements should satisfy code, written by Indians, to be in next > version of Postgres ? > > > > Dmitry (SQL50, HTML60) > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
