On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Ibrar Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we really need this kind of discussion here? > Dont know. But the post would have contained more specific matters. > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Sreejesh O S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Dmitry Turin > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, Pgsql-hackers. > >> > >> We would like to obtain your opinion on these two questions: > >> > >> > >> 1) We wanna append possibilities into Postgres engine, and wanna get top > >> estimation for > >> size of code, cost and time of implementation. > >> 1.1) We divide possibilities to elementary features, find analogues in > >> already written > >> code, and suppose e.g., that quantity of lines for 'create timer' will > be > >> similar to > >> 'create function', and that implementation for 'create timer' is easy > than > >> implementation > >> of 'create function' (because it already has prototype in 'create > >> function', and coping > >> source code is possiblle) > >> 1.2) We calculate cost and time by COCOMO > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocomo > >> > >> How relevant is this estimation ? > >> > >> > >> 2) We are captivated by price of Indians, > >> we listened much about low quality of code, written by Indians, > > > > How do you identify that the code written by Indians is low in quality ? > Do > > you subcontracted to an Indian company or so ? > >> > >> we are fearing, that American company will resale implementation to > Indian > >> subcontractor > >> (i.e. real developers will be Indians anyway). > >> > >> > >> What requirements should satisfy code, written by Indians, to be in next > >> version of Postgres ? > >> > >> > >> > >> Dmitry (SQL50, HTML60) > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > >> To make changes to your subscription: > >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers > > > > > > > > -- > Ibrar Ahmed > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com >
