Hi, > The idea is that we would be able to have multiple standby servers > connecting to one primary, yes? It would be useful to have sync > replication work that it must get an acknowledgement from at least one > standby before it continues.
No, in my current patch, only one standby can perform WAL streaming. Of course, Yes in the future (8.5?). > > Or do you think we would stream to just one standby, then use the > archiver (primary or standby) to keep sending files to allow multiple > additional standby nodes? Interesting! and Yes, we can. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
