Alex, * Alex Hunsaker (bada...@gmail.com) wrote: > Now it looks bogos but why not just move errmsg_col down to where we > actually use it? Or am I missing something?
Honestly, I think at this point is makes the most sense to just remove
it entirely, which I've done in the attached patch.
Thanks,
Stephen
colprivs_wip.2009010301.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
