On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 03:12 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 21:09 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Comments? > > If this is for backpatching, it makes sense. We should at least wait > until sync rep is accepted or rejected and docs written.
Why? Even if sync rep is accepted, pglesslog would still be useful for those who aren't using wal archiving right? > > In general I don't think we should refer/link to other companies' > copyrighted materials in our documentation. That could cause > difficulties. What? That seems a bit odd. I see zero problem with linking to the page, especially considering it is an open source project hosted on a postgresql project service. > > If you're going to do this, then I think you should go through the docs > and refer directly to many other commonly used tools that are also on > pg_foundry. > Well have some more information would certainly be useful but in this particular case I don't know of anything else on pgfoundry that would actually help with the problem Bruce is trying to solve. Joshua D. Drake > -- > Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com > PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support > > -- PostgreSQL Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
