> In general, IMHO, I don't think it's a good direction to go in to > include links to works of other copyright holders.
I think it's a great idea. IMHO, one of the major selling points of PostgreSQL is its awesome documentation. However, one of its weaknesses is that contrib module, pgfoundry projects, etc. are often not mentioned in the parts of the main documentation to which they relate. While I certainly don't want to go in the direction of telling people "Don't worry about the fact that we handle X poorly because there is a 5-year old, unmaintained pgfoundry module that fixes it", giving people references tools that the community thinks are good and useful seems very helpful to me. I am completely mystified as what linking "other copyright holders" has to do with it. That seems to imply that you fear some sort of legal entanglement, but I can't imagine what it could possibly be. Admittedly, IANAL. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
