Heikki Linnakangas escribió: > Alvaro, are you getting rid of pg_autovacuum in favor of the reloptions > for 8.4?
That's the intention, yes. > This patch adds a new column to pg_autovacuum, reflecting the new > vacuum_freeze_table_age GUC just like freeze_min_age column reflects > vacuum_freeze_min_age. If I commit this tomorrow, will I cause you a > lot of trouble with the reloptions patch? No -- go ahead, I'll merge it. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
