On Sunday 18 January 2009 08:24:47 Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes: > > On Thursday 15 January 2009 02:08:42 Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Added to TODO: > >> Have statement-level triggers fire for all tables in an > >> inheritance hierarchy > > > > I don't think that was really the conclusion from the thread. > > > > As far as I can interpret the opinions, statement level triggers should > > fire on the parent table only, rather than on some child, as it currently > > does. > > I think the consensus was that each table should have its own statement > triggers (if any) fire. Which is one possible reading of Bruce's TODO > item, but it's surely not clearly worded.
We should also consult the SQL standard. Its language regarding inheritance is sometimes not in line with our implementation (see recent discussion about GRANT). -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
