Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > On Thursday 15 January 2009 02:08:42 Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Added to TODO: > >> Have statement-level triggers fire for all tables in an > >> inheritance hierarchy > > > I don't think that was really the conclusion from the thread. > > > As far as I can interpret the opinions, statement level triggers should > > fire > > on the parent table only, rather than on some child, as it currently does. > > I think the consensus was that each table should have its own statement > triggers (if any) fire. Which is one possible reading of Bruce's TODO > item, but it's surely not clearly worded.
Sorry I had that wording wrong; TODO updated to: When statement-level triggers are defined on a parent table, have them fire only on the parent table, and fire child table triggers only where appropriate -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers