On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 15:06 +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote: > Done. Now GIN counts number of pending tuples and pages and stores they on > metapage. Index cleanup could start during normal insertion in two cases: > - number of pending tuples is too high to keep guaranteed non-lossy tidbitmap > - pending page's content doesn't fit into work_mem.
Great, thanks. I will take a look at this version tonight. Because time is short, I will mark it as "Ready for committer review" now. I think all of the major issues have been addressed, and I'll just be looking at the code and testing it. > BTW, gincostestimate could use that information for cost estimation, but is > index opening and metapge reading in amcostestimate acceptable? That sounds reasonable to me. I think that's what the index-specific cost estimators are for. Do you expect a performance impact? Regards, Jeff Davis -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers