On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 20:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Also, I really think it's a pretty bad idea to make index cost >> estimation depend on the current state of the index's pending list >> --- that state seems far too transient to base plan choices on. > > I'm confused by this. Don't we want to base the plan choice on the most > current data, even if it is transient? > > Regards, > Jeff Davis
Well, there's nothing to force that plan to be invalidated when the state of the pending list changes, is there? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
