* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Applied with revisions. The main externally visible change is that I > implemented per-column REFERENCES privilege, since that's required by > spec. I did some heavy revision of the parsing support too, as per > previous dicussions, and editorial cleanup and bugfixing elsewhere.
Great! Glad to hear it, and thanks for the updates and handling
REFERENCES.
> There are still some significant loose ends though:
[...]
I'll work on these and plan to finish them by Monday.
> * Perhaps it would be appropriate to let LOCK TABLE succeed if you have
> proper permissions on at least one column of the table. However, it's
> bad enough that LOCK TABLE examines permissions before locking the table
> now; I don't think it ought to be grovelling through the columns without
> lock. So this might be a place to leave well enough alone.
Agreed.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
