* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > BTW, something else I'd meant to bring up for discussion is whether > anyone likes the formatting of column privileges in \dp:
Well, I kinda like it, but that's not an entirely unbiased opinion. ;)
> Access privileges
> Schema | Name | Type | Access privileges | Column access privileges
> --------+------+-------+---------------------------+--------------------------
> public | foo | table | postgres=arwdDxt/postgres | bar:
> : joe=r/postgres : joe=a/postgres
> : baz:
> : joe=w/postgres
> (1 row)
>
> (The colons after the column names are something I added on my own
> authority to Stephen's original.)
sure, makes sense.
> This seems a bit ASCII-art-ish to me; it certainly wouldn't be readily
> parsable by programs. Now that's not really the design goal for \d
> output, and I don't have a better suggestion offhand, but still...
> anyone got a better idea?
One thing that just occured to me is that we could, should we want to,
move the column-level privs over into the 'Access privileges' column by
just adding them on after the table-level privs. We would want to make
sure the table-level privs come first and maybe have some seperator to
indicate that the following are column-level privs.
That might make the display nicer on 80-col systems, though personally
I like larger windows. :)
A couple of things I didn't particularly like:
I don't like having to have a separate command to show column-level
privs, and I don't really like displaying the column-level privs after
the regular \dp output for tables.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
