On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > This would all be a little easier to accomplish if the behavior were > made to be implicit in the rewriter (ie, rewrite instead of throwing a > "no rule" error), since then there is no persistent state that a GUC or > reloption would have to try to add or get rid of.
why we don't follow this path from the beggining? what are the pros and cons of this? -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
