Gregory Stark <st...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> ON UPDATE DO INSTEAD SUBSTITUTE base_table [ (base_column_name, ...) ]
>> [ WHERE ... ]
>>
>> ON UPDATE DO INSTEAD
>> UPDATE base_table SET base_col_1 = new.derived_col_1, base_col_2 ...
>> WHERE CURRENT OF VIEW;
> What would happen with these if the view is defined with "SELECT *" and I add
> a new column or drop columns from the table?
Nothing, just as happens now, because the * got expanded to a set column
list by the parser before the view ever got defined.
> This same machinery isn't present in the normal executor is it? I mean, if I
> can update a view then ISTM I should be able to update a view written inline
> in the query like:
> UPDATE (select * from a where x=1) set y=2
That is not a view; the primary reason why not being that there are no
applicable rules.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
