On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Alex Hunsaker <bada...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -the various (only moved not added) > strncpy(...) > copy[len] = '\0'; > > just use strlcpy? >
Thanks for having a look Alex. strlcpy would be easier, but I thought there might be portability concerns re its non-entirely-standard status. A quick grep through the backend code shows that strlcpy and strncpy are both in use, with neither having a clear majority. I used strncpy because it is more prevalent within src/backend/utils/adt. Happy to use strlcpy if it is acceptable though. Anybody else have an opinion on this? Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
