Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think the best thing we could do overall is to set release dates and
>> stick to them.  If your patch is not ready, well, at least it will get
>> out in a defined amount of time.  Right now, the *real* problem with it
>> being pushed to the next release is you don't know how successful some
>> other guy will be at persuading us to delay the next release.
> 
> +1, LOL.
> 
> Let's not forget that we've already got CTE, window functions, partial
> vacuums, and column-level permissions, all of which are major features
> that should benefit a lot of people.  I hope Hot Standby gets
> committed but even if it doesn't, I'm still going to get a lot of
> benefit out of this release, so I'd like it to happen on some sort of
> reasonable time scale.

Agreed. Even without HS, this will be one of the biggest releases we've
had in a while, IMHO.

//Magnus


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to