Robert Haas wrote: >> I think the best thing we could do overall is to set release dates and >> stick to them. If your patch is not ready, well, at least it will get >> out in a defined amount of time. Right now, the *real* problem with it >> being pushed to the next release is you don't know how successful some >> other guy will be at persuading us to delay the next release. > > +1, LOL. > > Let's not forget that we've already got CTE, window functions, partial > vacuums, and column-level permissions, all of which are major features > that should benefit a lot of people. I hope Hot Standby gets > committed but even if it doesn't, I'm still going to get a lot of > benefit out of this release, so I'd like it to happen on some sort of > reasonable time scale.
Agreed. Even without HS, this will be one of the biggest releases we've had in a while, IMHO. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers