Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:36:50 Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Peter Eisentraut (pete...@gmx.net) wrote: > > > As one of the earlier reviewers, I think the design is OK, but the way > > > the implementation is presented was not acceptable, and very little has > > > been accomplished in terms of reacting to our comments. For example, > > > where is the SQL row security feature, which should have been designed, > > > implemented, and committed separately, in the opinion of most > > > commentaries. > > > > Eh? Are you thinking of column-level privileges, which was committed > > last week? > > No.
The point is we would have preferred to see SQL-level row permissions as a separate patch first; that just didn't happen in this case, and it makes the discussion a little more complex. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
