KaiGai Kohei wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > OK, time for me to chime in. > > > > I think the outstanding commit-fest items can be broken down into four > > sections: > > > > o Log streaming > > o Hot standby > > o SE-PostgreSQL > > o Others > > - snip - > > > SE-PostgreSQL has been in steady development for a year so this is the > > time to decide about it. My feeling is if we don't accept it now, we > > are never going to have SE-Linux or row-level security. The next week > > should show us the right direction when we start discussion on > > Wednesday, noon GMT. > > Hmm...? > This conditional punishment of death seems to me not a reasonable one. > If we can found a matter as a result of discussion, which is impossible > to fix within reasonable term, I'll agree it being postponed to v8.5. > However, why is the punishment of death necessary here?
What I meant was that this features is not going to get any better than the work you have done, so if we reject it odds are we will never accept it. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
