Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> writes: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Updatable views is reverted. I agree that we should reject the rest and >> prepare a release.
> That will send a fine message to those companies that have sponsored > development work - that we will arbitrarily reject large patches that > have been worked on following the procedures that we require. "defer to 8.5" would have been better phraseology than "reject", no doubt. > We must at least have the solid belief (of a committer that that has > done a proper review) that a patch cannot be polished in an > appropriate timeframe, I already pointed out some pretty serious problems with the updatable views patch. Are you claiming they are trivial to fix? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers