Dave Page <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Updatable views is reverted. I agree that we should reject the rest and
>> prepare a release.
> That will send a fine message to those companies that have sponsored
> development work - that we will arbitrarily reject large patches that
> have been worked on following the procedures that we require.
"defer to 8.5" would have been better phraseology than "reject",
no doubt.
> We must at least have the solid belief (of a committer that that has
> done a proper review) that a patch cannot be polished in an
> appropriate timeframe,
I already pointed out some pretty serious problems with the updatable
views patch. Are you claiming they are trivial to fix?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
