Alvaro Herrera escreveu: >> (ii) I think we should change the expression "storage parameters" for >> something else because autovacuum is related to maintenance. My suggestion is >> a general expression like "relation parameters"; > > I'm not sure I agree with this idea, because the term "storage > parameter" has been used for several releases already. This would be a > relatively major terminology change. > I don't buy your argument. 'fillfactor' is a _storage_ parameter but 'autovacuum_enabled' is not. I don't like terminology changes too but in this case it sounds strange calling autovacuum_* as storage parameters.
-- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
