Serguei Mokhov wrote:
>Maybe a better solution for the short run would be
>return the page where it was, and but links to the pgsql-bugs and
>pgsql-hackers archives with some sort of exmplanatory saying that "this is
>a *complete* (it must be complete of course) list of bugs, which are
>being extensively discussed in the these lists and fixed. Please, visit/search
>these mail archives for most up-to-date information blah blah blah" One can
>invent some appropriate wording, I guess. But this atleast will show people
>that there's work acually going on, and on daily basis. And also a good idea
>to have "Last updated" time stamp on the page too... so it doesn't seem
>to be forgotten for ages..
>
The archives are a 'flat' database of bugs which require a lot of work
for a researcher to figure out if a bug is already documented and what
the status is. It is also not 100% accurate as not all bugs get
reported there.
-d
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
