ITAGAKI Takahiro escreveu: > 1. fillfactor.* options are silently ignored when the table doesn't have > toast relation. Should we notice the behabior to users? > ex. NOTICE: toast storage parameters are ignored > because the table doesn't have toast relations. > It was discussed and rejected [1].
> I think we should show toast.* parameters in \d+ for base tables > because it has consistency; we set them at ALTER TABLE for base tables. > +1. That's because the psql patch was applied _before_ the namespace patch. It seems we will need to hardcode the namespace notion at psql code. [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-02/msg00042.php -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
