Alvaro Herrera wrote: > ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > > > I tested this changes and found two issues: > > > > 1. fillfactor.* options are silently ignored when the table doesn't have > > toast relation. Should we notice the behabior to users? > > ex. NOTICE: toast storage parameters are ignored > > because the table doesn't have toast relations. > > You mean "toast.* options"? If so, yes, they are silently ignored. > Maybe issuing a warning is not a bad idea. Care to propose a patch?
Any takers here? The second issue has been solved. Thanks for testing. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
