Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >> User Bmomjian wrote: > >>> Log Message: > >>> ----------- > >>> Add support for specifying port numbers. > >> Hmm, I suppose we can't readily run pg_dump against a stand-alone backend? > > > > I am confused by the question; we used to default to the 5432 port > > numbers. > > I was thinking that we could sidestep the whole port number question if > we didn't try to start up postmaster, and used a stand-alone backend ( > postgres --single) instead.
Libpq can't connect to a stand-alone backend and we have many libpq queries. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
