Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> writes: > > I was thinking that we could sidestep the whole port number question if > > we didn't try to start up postmaster, and used a stand-alone backend ( > > postgres --single) instead. > > That would be a good place to get to eventually, but I think it'd be > a serious error to be expending development effort on the point right > now. We need a *working* migrator; simplifying its use can come later.
And I will have it working for 8.4, if it doesn't already work (I am not sure). -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
