On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 13:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Right, that's what I meant --- do all the work within pg_dump. > > > Is this acceptable to everyone? We could name the option > > -u/--upgrade-compatible. > > If the switch is specifically for pg_upgrade support (enabling this as > well as any other hacks we find necessary), which seems like a good > idea, then don't chew up a short option letter for it. There should be > a long form only. And probably not even list it in the user > documentation.
Why wouldn't we want to list it? Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
