Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 13:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Right, that's what I meant --- do all the work within pg_dump. > > > > > Is this acceptable to everyone? We could name the option > > > -u/--upgrade-compatible. > > > > If the switch is specifically for pg_upgrade support (enabling this as > > well as any other hacks we find necessary), which seems like a good > > idea, then don't chew up a short option letter for it. There should be > > a long form only. And probably not even list it in the user > > documentation. > > Why wouldn't we want to list it?
Because it is for internal use by upgrade utilities, not for user use. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
