On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:16:39PM -0500, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > > On 2009-02-12, at 14:15 , Jonah H. Harris wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com >> >wrote: >> >>> --num-workers or --num-connections would both work. >> >> --num-parallel? > > --num-concurrent?
--num-bikeshed? ;) Cheers, David (purple!) -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
