Peter Eisentraut wrote:
While I think "jobs" isn't a totally accurate description, I would still
propose to use -j/--jobs for the option name, because it is neutral about the
implementation and has a strong precedent as being used to increase the
parallelization to get the work done faster. I also noticed that Andrew D.
used "jobs" in his own emails to comment on the feature. :-)
The attached patch also updated the documentation to give some additional
advice about which numbers to use.
Looks reasonable.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
