Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> vacuum analyze doesn't unfreeze pg_class. It could create unfrozen > >> tuples in pg_statistic, perhaps, but we could easily fix that by > >> truncating pg_statistic afterwards (its not like there will be useful > >> data there...) > > > I have added --analyze to the vacuumdb command and documented its > > purpose. > > Surely that's backwards? What's the point of doing analyze work you'll > have to throw away?
Hmmm, that is true; removed. > >> The end goal is going to be to have all this work happen in a standalone > >> backend, > > > Any idea how to do that? > > I didn't say it was easy. Well, seeing as we want something for 8.4, I figured you had a plan. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
