Tom Lane wrote: > I think this is probably going in the wrong direction. The reason > gram.h isn't already in the main include tree is that we don't *want* > all and sundry depending on it --- we have very carefully minimized > the number of files that depend on the grammar's symbol codes. > > ISTM that pg_dump doesn't actually care about the symbol codes, it > just needs a list of known keywords.
Hmm, I had thought that pg_dump only wanted the header file, not the keywords.o object file. I now see that I was wrong. I agree that your proposed solution is a lot better. I'll see about it. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
