On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Sabino Mullane <g...@endpoint.com> writes: > > The solution I came up with is to use a new letter, -I, and to deprecate -d > > by > > having it throw an exception when used. > > "Deprecate" does not mean "break".
Sorry Tom. Greg is correct here although I disagree with his wording. It should be removed and if someone passes -d it should throw an ERROR that says something like: ERROR: -d has been replaced by -I Greg and I are both in the field and the field consistently uses -d in the wrong way. Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
