Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes: >> Sorry Tom. Greg is correct here although I disagree with his wording. It >> should be removed and if someone passes -d it should throw an ERROR that >> says something like: >> ERROR: -d has been replaced by -I > > Well, if you want to break it, we can debate about the wisdom of that. > But please don't describe the patch in such a misleading way as the > current thread title.
+1 with breaking it, but with a better message (and let's call it breaking, not deprecating). Oh, and the patch contains what looks like two merge failures, I'm sure that wasn't intentional... //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
