Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>>>   -i, --ignore-version     proceed even when server version mismatches
>>>                            pg_dump version
>> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely.
>> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts".
> 
> I thought about something like that, but that would break even more existing
> scripts than the current patch, no? I'd be all for not using -I though, as 
> that
> would not break anything.
> 
> Sorry about the "deprecation" name, I withdraw that part
> 
> Magnus: Sorry about non-mergeability, I wrote this while offline...

No, the problem is not that I get merge failures. It's that *your* merge
conflicts are included in the patch itself.

//Magnus

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to