Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: >>> -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches >>> pg_dump version >> Proposal: drop the short forms of these two switches entirely. >> Anybody who actually needs the capability can write "--inserts". > > I thought about something like that, but that would break even more existing > scripts than the current patch, no? I'd be all for not using -I though, as > that > would not break anything. > > Sorry about the "deprecation" name, I withdraw that part > > Magnus: Sorry about non-mergeability, I wrote this while offline...
No, the problem is not that I get merge failures. It's that *your* merge conflicts are included in the patch itself. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers