"Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You're just putting the hard decision onto packagers, who have no more
>> knowledge than you do about what their users want, and (probably)
>> considerably less understanding of the benefits/risks of some new
>> configure option they happen to notice.
> Which is exactly why we have two types of RPMS, --integer-datetimes and
> not.
Maybe Devrim is doing that, but nobody else is. Debian went for
--integer-datetimes years ago, Red Hat stuck with floats. Nobody
is going to go to the trouble of maintaining two sets of RPMs, even
assuming they notice there's a choice.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
