Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > The problem is that the 2-digit year check is for <=2 digits, not > > exactly two digits: > > ... > > This leads to some unexpected outputs: > > > test=> select '1-1-0'::date; > > date > > ------------ > > 2000-01-01 > > We've interpreted that like that since 7.4, without complaints; and > I think it was an intentional change then (since 7.3 doesn't accept it). > I do not recommend changing it.
OK, the release note text will be: Reject year '0 BC' and years '000' and '0000' (Tom) Previously these were interpreted as 1 BC. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + - Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers