Robert Treat wrote: > On Tuesday 17 March 2009 09:38:59 Bruce Momjian wrote: > > You are assuming that only commit-fest work is required to get us to > > beta. You might remember the long list of open items I faced in January > > that I have whittled down, but I still have about twenty left. > > > > I think part of the perception of the project sitting around doing nothing > isn't so much that you/tom are doing nothing, but others who were doing > review or coding features are now caught in limbo. One of the things the > commitfest has been successful at is helping delegate code review. Perhaps we > need to take a fresh look at your list of twenty things and see what can be > delegated out to others.
Yep, I agree. The problem is that last time I put out a list that wasn't clensed I got a lot of compaints so I am only going to put out a list that is 100% accurate, and that will take hours to produce, time I don't have now because I am working on the release notes. And things are getting addressed, like the pg_restore -j/-m flag and GIN index changes, so there is movement, there just isn't documented movement. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
