On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 12:02 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > On Saturday 21 March 2009 09:04:12 Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > Robert Haas wrote: > <snip> > > My concern with the list of outstanding items for 8.4 based on a quick > > look is that I think many of those things are not, in fact, > > outstanding items for 8.4, and those that are may not be important > > enough to hold up beta for. Now since I haven't read through them all > > yet, I'm not 100% sure of that, but that's my concern for what it's > > worth. > > > > Robert, this has been discussed many times before, and most people agree > with > you, but Bruce doesn't. I think the ony way this will change is if someone > takes on the role of "release notes manager", subscrbes to pgsql-commits, and > then starts updating a wiki page as each item is committed. Once other > committers see that, I'm guessing they will start helping, and eventually > Bruce will join in. Outside of that I think we're wasting our time on this.
This is actually a good point regardless of Bruce. The run down is this: We have an individual that does stuff a certain way. That way works for him. That individual is the one actually doing the work. We have other individuals who would like to do it a different way. I invite those individuals to do so. If there way proves to be more efficient the community will move in that direction. Joshua D. Drake > > -- > Robert Treat > Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net > Consulting: http://www.omniti.com > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
