Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > [ typedef lists ] > > Hmm ... the windows members are claiming that "int", "char", "float", > "double" etc are typedefs, which doesn't exactly match up with my > mental model of C.
I don't think this is a problem, because the whole point is telling indent what names should be considered type names, which of course those should all be. > On the other hand, dungbeetle is failing to report > a whole bunch of typedefs that it should report, for example > AfterTriggerEventDataOneCtid which comes from entirely non platform > specific code in commands/trigger.c. This was probably optimized out by the compiler. I tend to think that having this list is much better than no list at all (the current situation), and it's better than the old list we used to have. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
