Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> Well, we are not the "Make Merlin Happy club".  ;-)

Merlin and Andrew were the ones complaining initially.  If they feel
that a proposed patch doesn't fix the problem, then I'd say that it
isn't fixing the problem.

> My personal opinion is that adding #defines to PQinitSSL() is the right
> level of fix, and if we ever implement a libpq init mechanism we can
> convert PGinitSSL to a macro. I am attaching a sample patch for
> feedback. 

This is just a rehash of one of the patches that was discussed earlier.
There wasn't consensus for it then, and there's not now.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to