On 30 mar 2009, at 17.24, Andrew Chernow <a...@esilo.com> wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, unless someone objects I'd like to make the name of that
function
PQinitSecurity.
Agreed. Although, both PQinitSecure and PQinitSecurity are very
general names. "Security" can mean a lot of things. Maybe the name
should be more particular, like PQinitOpenSSL. I think its okay to
reference the openssl project name being how this function is
designed to work with openssl's library split.
+1
It's quite likely that well want to support another ssl library in the
future. At least likely enough that any api we define should take it
into consideration.
/Magnus
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
