Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> And we get into the whole question of error handling, which is what > >> shot down that proposal last time. > > > Can you remind me of the details? I don't remember that issue. > > Currently PQinitSSL() returns void, so I don't see an issue there. > > The point is exactly the same as the complaint about turning PQinitSSL's > argument into a bitmask: if you are trying to define an extensible API > then you need a way for the app to determine whether all the bits it > passed were recognizable by the library.
It seems having the init function return the bits it recognized would be the logical return value. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
