Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> Attached patch fixes this in my testcase. Can anybody spot something
> wrong with it?

It depends on tolower(), which is going to have LC_CTYPE-dependent
behavior, which is surely wrong?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to