Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
>> Attached patch fixes this in my testcase. Can anybody spot something
>> wrong with it?
> 
> It depends on tolower(), which is going to have LC_CTYPE-dependent
> behavior, which is surely wrong?

Not sure, really :) That's the encoding we'd get the paths in in the
first place, is it not?

Or are you just saying we should be using pg_tolower()?  (which I forgot
about yet again)

//Magnus


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to