Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> Attached patch fixes this in my testcase. Can anybody spot something >> wrong with it? > > It depends on tolower(), which is going to have LC_CTYPE-dependent > behavior, which is surely wrong?
Not sure, really :) That's the encoding we'd get the paths in in the first place, is it not? Or are you just saying we should be using pg_tolower()? (which I forgot about yet again) //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
