Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takah...@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: > BTW, why the function was named pg_stat_*user*_functions ? > even though there are no 'all' and 'sys' versions.
Well, it ignores built-in functions. Naming the view that way seems like good future-proofing to me --- maybe someday we'll think of a sufficiently low-overhead way to offer stats for system functions too. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers