Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > >> > Are there any TODOs here? > >> > >> I'd say that all of the items listed in my original email could be > >> TODOs. ?I'm planning to work on as many of them as I have time for. > >> Ramon Lawrence is also working on some related ideas, as discussed > >> upthread. ?AFAICS no one has expressed the idea that anything that's > >> been talked about is a bad idea, so it's just a question of finding > >> enough round tuits. > > > > OK, would you please add them to the Index/Hash section of the TODO > > list; ?I am afraid I will not do the justice. > > I think perhaps Optimizer / Executor would be more appropriate, since > these are not about hash indices but rather about hash joins. I will > look at doing that.
Yes, please. > Also I think the last item under Index / Hash is actually NOT done, > and belongs in the main index section rather than Index / Hash. Yep, I didn't realize that editing "Index" also does the subsections, while editing the subsections doesn't edit the upper level. > The first item in the Index / Hash section doesn't really look like a > TODO, or at the very least it's unclear what the action item is > supposed to be. Yep, remove, thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers