On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> I think perhaps Optimizer / Executor would be more appropriate, since >> these are not about hash indices but rather about hash joins. I will >> look at doing that. > > Yes, please.
Done. See what you think... >> Also I think the last item under Index / Hash is actually NOT done, >> and belongs in the main index section rather than Index / Hash. > > Yep, I didn't realize that editing "Index" also does the subsections, > while editing the subsections doesn't edit the upper level. Heh. I'd write some webapps to do some of these things, but I haven't been able to interest anyone in providing me with a postgresql.org-based hosting arrangement. >> The first item in the Index / Hash section doesn't really look like a >> TODO, or at the very least it's unclear what the action item is >> supposed to be. > > Yep, remove, thanks. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers