On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So based on this comment and Stephen's remarks, I'm going to assume
>> that I'm succumbing to a fit of unjustified paranoia and re-implement
>> as you suggest.
>
> OK, new version of patch, this time with the weird scaling removed and
> the datatype changed to float4.
>
In this paragraph i think you mean: "ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ...
SET DISTINCT"?
<para>
+ The analyzer also estimates the number of distinct values that appear
+ in each column. Because only a subset of pages are scanned, this method
+ can sometimes be quite inaccurate, especially for large tables. If this
+ inaccuracy leads to bad query plans, the analyzer can be forced to use
+ a more correct value with <command>ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... SET
+ STATISTICS</command> (see <xref linkend="sql-altertable"
+ endterm="sql-altertable-title">).
+ </para>
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
